WC3 TrackerMaps( 7.5)V Seraphzzang vs 5329
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

( 7.5)V Seraphzzang vs 5329

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 9,329 recorded sessions versus 5. 5329 averages more players per lobby (5 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. ( 7.5)V Seraphzzang lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

( 7.5)V Seraphzzang 5329
Head to Head
Metric( 7.5)V Seraphzzang5329
Total sessions59,329
Unique hosts1486
Avg players/lobby1.85
Avg lobby open time0.7 min 2.6 min
Sessions (30d)02,741
Tracked versions157
Last hostedMay 30, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
5
3,425
Jun 26
0
3,253

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing ( 7.5)V Seraphzzang and 5329 on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 9,329 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (5) than ( 7.5)V Seraphzzang (1.8).
( 7.5)V Seraphzzang lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,741 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
( 7.5)V Seraphzzang has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and 5329 by 486. 5329 has the wider host base.