WC3 TrackerMaps1[1][1][1].2d vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

1[1][1][1].2d vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,501 recorded sessions versus 3. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. 1[1][1][1].2d lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

1[1][1][1].2d Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric1[1][1][1].2dDirect Strike
Total sessions318,501
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby15.2
Avg lobby open time0.7 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)19,751
Tracked versions170
Last hostedJun 3, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
1
10,499

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 1[1][1][1].2d and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,501 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than 1[1][1][1].2d (1).
1[1][1][1].2d lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,751 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
1[1][1][1].2d has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.