WC3 TrackerMaps2.39e vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

2.39e vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,501 recorded sessions versus 28. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. 2.39e lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

2.39e Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric2.39eDirect Strike
Total sessions2818,501
Unique hosts41,615
Avg players/lobby1.55.2
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)169,751
Tracked versions370
Last hostedJun 9, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
12
8,392
Jun 26
16
10,499

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 2.39e and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,501 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 28 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than 2.39e (1.5).
2.39e lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,751 vs 16). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
2.39e has been hosted by 4 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.