WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 9,331 recorded sessions versus 11. 5329 averages more players per lobby (5 vs 1.7), suggesting larger games. 5329 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 6.5 min for Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt
Head to Head
Metric5329Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt
Total sessions9,331 11
Unique hosts486 3
Avg players/lobby5 1.7
Avg lobby open time2.6 min 6.5 min
Sessions (30d)2,762 9
Tracked versions571
Last hostedJun 9, 2026Jun 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3,425
2
Jun 26
3,259
9

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 9,331 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (5) than Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt (1.7).
5329 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 6.5 min for Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,762 vs 9). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt by 3. 5329 has the wider host base.