WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs T62020
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs T62020

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 9,329 recorded sessions versus 17. 5329 averages more players per lobby (5 vs 1), suggesting larger games. T62020 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.3 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 T62020
Head to Head
Metric5329T62020
Total sessions9,329 17
Unique hosts486 1
Avg players/lobby5 1
Avg lobby open time2.6 min0.3 min
Sessions (30d)2,734 16
Tracked versions571
Last hostedJun 9, 2026Jun 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3,425
1
Jun 26
3,252
16

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and T62020 on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 9,329 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 17 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (5) than T62020 (1).
T62020 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.3 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,734 vs 16). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and T62020 by 1. 5329 has the wider host base.