WC3 Tracker›Maps›5329 vs The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0)

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 9,327 recorded sessions versus 3. 5329 averages more players per lobby (5 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0)
Head to Head
Metric5329The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0)
Total sessions9,327 ▲3
Unique hosts486 ▲2
Avg players/lobby5 ▲1.3
Avg lobby open time2.6 min1.6 min ▲
Sessions (30d)2,825 ▲0
Tracked versions571
Last hostedJun 9, 2026May 30, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3,425
3
Jun 26
3,247
0
Explore Each Map
5329 full stats → The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) full stats → Watch live 5329 lobbies Watch live The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 9,327 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (5) than The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) (1.3).
The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,825 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) by 2. 5329 has the wider host base.