WC3 Tracker›Maps›Ancient Enfo Team Survival vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ancient Enfo Team Survival vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,504 recorded sessions versus 1. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 2.5 min for Ancient Enfo Team Survival. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Ancient Enfo Team Survival Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAncient Enfo Team SurvivalDirect Strike
Total sessions118,504 ▲
Unique hosts11,615 ▲
Avg players/lobby45.2 ▲
Avg lobby open time2.5 min1.6 min ▲
Sessions (30d)19,854 ▲
Tracked versions170
Last hostedJun 2, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
1
10,502
Explore Each Map
Ancient Enfo Team Survival full stats → Direct Strike full stats → Watch live Ancient Enfo Team Survival lobbies Watch live Direct Strike lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ancient Enfo Team Survival and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,504 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Ancient Enfo Team Survival (4).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 2.5 min for Ancient Enfo Team Survival. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,854 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ancient Enfo Team Survival has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.