WC3 TrackerMapsBfme Ai vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bfme Ai vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,504 recorded sessions versus 7. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. Bfme Ai lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.3 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Bfme Ai Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBfme AiDirect Strike
Total sessions718,504
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby1.35.2
Avg lobby open time0.3 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)09,832
Tracked versions170
Last hostedMay 30, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
7
8,392
Jun 26
0
10,502

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bfme Ai and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,504 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Bfme Ai (1.3).
Bfme Ai lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.3 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,832 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bfme Ai has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.