WC3 TrackerMapsBuild To Fight vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Build To Fight vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,501 recorded sessions versus 16. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 4.1), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 17.9 min for Build To Fight. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Build To Fight Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBuild To FightDirect Strike
Total sessions1618,501
Unique hosts21,615
Avg players/lobby4.15.2
Avg lobby open time17.9 min1.6 min
Sessions (30d)89,751
Tracked versions170
Last hostedJun 3, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3
8,392
Jun 26
13
10,499

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Build To Fight and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,501 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 16 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Build To Fight (4.1).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 17.9 min for Build To Fight. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,751 vs 8). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Build To Fight has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.