WC3 TrackerMapsConqueror vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Conqueror vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,501 recorded sessions versus 10. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Conqueror lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Conqueror Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricConquerorDirect Strike
Total sessions1018,501
Unique hosts21,615
Avg players/lobby15.2
Avg lobby open time1.5 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)19,752
Tracked versions170
Last hostedJun 7, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
7
8,392
Jun 26
4
10,499

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Conqueror and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,501 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 10 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Conqueror (1).
Conqueror lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,752 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Conqueror has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.