WC3 Tracker›Maps›Fictional Showdown Beta Test vs Towersurvivors
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Fictional Showdown Beta Test vs Towersurvivors

Towersurvivors is the more popular of the two, with 15,373 recorded sessions versus 6. Towersurvivors averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Fictional Showdown Beta Test lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.4 min for Towersurvivors. Over the past 30 days, Towersurvivors has seen more activity.

Fictional Showdown Beta Test Towersurvivors
Head to Head
MetricFictional Showdown Beta TestTowersurvivors
Total sessions615,373 ▲
Unique hosts31,229 ▲
Avg players/lobby44.4 ▲
Avg lobby open time1.1 min ▲1.4 min
Sessions (30d)18,795 ▲
Tracked versions165
Last hostedJun 5, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3
7,617
Jun 26
1
9,278
Explore Each Map
Fictional Showdown Beta Test full stats → Towersurvivors full stats → Watch live Fictional Showdown Beta Test lobbies Watch live Towersurvivors lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Fictional Showdown Beta Test and Towersurvivors on Warcraft 3

Towersurvivors is more popular, with 15,373 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 6 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Towersurvivors has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Fictional Showdown Beta Test (4).
Fictional Showdown Beta Test lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.4 min for Towersurvivors. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Towersurvivors has had more sessions in the last 30 days (8,795 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Fictional Showdown Beta Test has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Towersurvivors by 1,229. Towersurvivors has the wider host base.