WC3 Tracker›Maps›The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) vs Towersurvivors
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) vs Towersurvivors

Towersurvivors is the more popular of the two, with 15,373 recorded sessions versus 3. Towersurvivors averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. Towersurvivors lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.6 min for The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0). Over the past 30 days, Towersurvivors has seen more activity.

The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) Towersurvivors
Head to Head
MetricThe Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0)Towersurvivors
Total sessions315,373 ▲
Unique hosts21,229 ▲
Avg players/lobby1.34.4 ▲
Avg lobby open time1.6 min1.4 min ▲
Sessions (30d)08,675 ▲
Tracked versions165
Last hostedMay 30, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3
7,617
Jun 26
0
9,278
Explore Each Map
The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) full stats → Towersurvivors full stats → Watch live The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) lobbies Watch live Towersurvivors lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) and Towersurvivors on Warcraft 3

Towersurvivors is more popular, with 15,373 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Towersurvivors has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) (1.3).
Towersurvivors lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.6 min for The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Towersurvivors has had more sessions in the last 30 days (8,675 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
The Battle For Osgiliath (Rf Beta 1.0) has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Towersurvivors by 1,229. Towersurvivors has the wider host base.