WC3 TrackerMaps000[Ct] vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

000[Ct] vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,271 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.6), suggesting larger games. 000[Ct] lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.3 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

000[Ct] Warofraces
Head to Head
Metric000[Ct]Warofraces
Total sessions57,271
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby1.64.6
Avg lobby open time0.3 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,647
Tracked versions432
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 4, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
1,531
Jun 26
1
4,233
Jul 26
1
796

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 000[Ct] and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,271 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than 000[Ct] (1.6).
000[Ct] lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.3 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,647 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
000[Ct] has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.