WC3 TrackerMaps000v3.2 Fabu vs 5329
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

000v3.2 Fabu vs 5329

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 10,084 recorded sessions versus 9. 5329 averages more players per lobby (4.9 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. 000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 2.8 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

000v3.2 Fabu 5329
Head to Head
Metric000v3.2 Fabu5329
Total sessions910,084
Unique hosts1486
Avg players/lobby1.34.9
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 2.8 min
Sessions (30d)91,969
Tracked versions157
Last hostedJun 14, 2026Jun 14, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
3,425
Jun 26
9
4,061

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 000v3.2 Fabu and 5329 on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 10,084 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 9 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (4.9) than 000v3.2 Fabu (1.3).
000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 2.8 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,969 vs 9). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
000v3.2 Fabu has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and 5329 by 486. 5329 has the wider host base.