WC3 TrackerMaps000v3.2 Fabu vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

000v3.2 Fabu vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 19,200 recorded sessions versus 9. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. 000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

000v3.2 Fabu Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric000v3.2 FabuDirect Strike
Total sessions919,200
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby1.35.2
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)99,214
Tracked versions176
Last hostedJun 14, 2026Jun 14, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
9
11,245

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 000v3.2 Fabu and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 19,200 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 9 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than 000v3.2 Fabu (1.3).
000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,214 vs 9). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
000v3.2 Fabu has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.