WC3 TrackerMaps000v3.2 Fabu vs Zombie Defense
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

000v3.2 Fabu vs Zombie Defense

Zombie Defense is the more popular of the two, with 4,898 recorded sessions versus 9. Zombie Defense averages more players per lobby (2.7 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. 000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. Over the past 30 days, Zombie Defense has seen more activity.

000v3.2 Fabu Zombie Defense
Head to Head
Metric000v3.2 FabuZombie Defense
Total sessions94,898
Unique hosts1281
Avg players/lobby1.32.7
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 2.4 min
Sessions (30d)92,186
Tracked versions130
Last hostedJun 14, 2026Jun 14, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
2,307
Jun 26
9
2,501

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 000v3.2 Fabu and Zombie Defense on Warcraft 3

Zombie Defense is more popular, with 4,898 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 9 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Zombie Defense has more players per lobby on average (2.7) than 000v3.2 Fabu (1.3).
000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Zombie Defense has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,186 vs 9). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
000v3.2 Fabu has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Zombie Defense by 281. Zombie Defense has the wider host base.