WC3 TrackerMaps1.02zb vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

1.02zb vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,485 recorded sessions versus 7. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 4.3), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2 min for 1.02zb. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

1.02zb Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric1.02zbDirect Strike
Total sessions747,485
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby4.35.3
Avg lobby open time2 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)09,727
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJun 21, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
3
30,642
Jul 26
0
14,356

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 1.02zb and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,485 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than 1.02zb (4.3).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2 min for 1.02zb. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,727 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
1.02zb has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.