WC3 TrackerMaps1.0lunatic vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

1.0lunatic vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 33,883 recorded sessions versus 3. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. 1.0lunatic lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

1.0lunatic Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric1.0lunaticDirect Strike
Total sessions333,883
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby1.35.2
Avg lobby open time1.2 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)111,152
Tracked versions297
Last hostedJun 28, 2026Jun 29, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
1
28,888

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 1.0lunatic and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 33,883 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than 1.0lunatic (1.3).
1.0lunatic lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (11,152 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
1.0lunatic has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.