WC3 TrackerMaps1902 vs Ordr
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

1902 vs Ordr

Ordr is the more popular of the two, with 527,256 recorded sessions versus 3. Ordr averages more players per lobby (2.2 vs 2), suggesting larger games. 1902 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.1 min for Ordr. Over the past 30 days, Ordr has seen more activity.

1902 Ordr
Head to Head
Metric1902Ordr
Total sessions3527,256
Unique hosts120,142
Avg players/lobby22.2
Avg lobby open time0.4 min 1.1 min
Sessions (30d)0163,917
Tracked versions1215
Last hostedMay 18, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
95,646
Jun 26
0
403,714
Jul 26
0
133,098

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 1902 and Ordr on Warcraft 3

Ordr is more popular, with 527,256 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Ordr has more players per lobby on average (2.2) than 1902 (2).
1902 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.1 min for Ordr. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Ordr has had more sessions in the last 30 days (163,917 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
1902 has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Ordr by 20,142. Ordr has the wider host base.