WC3 TrackerMaps2.0 vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

2.0 vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 42,620 recorded sessions versus 223. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3 min for 2.0. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

2.0 Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric2.0Direct Strike
Total sessions22342,620
Unique hosts301,615
Avg players/lobby25.2
Avg lobby open time3 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)9710,881
Tracked versions14102
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
33
8,392
Jun 26
158
30,642
Jul 26
58
8,287

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 2.0 and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 42,620 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 223 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than 2.0 (2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3 min for 2.0. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,881 vs 97). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
2.0 has been hosted by 30 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.