WC3 TrackerMaps2200 vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

2200 vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 53,132 recorded sessions versus 60. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 3.1), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.1 min for 2200. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

2200 Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric2200Direct Strike
Total sessions6053,132
Unique hosts91,615
Avg players/lobby3.15.3
Avg lobby open time4.1 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)609,954
Tracked versions5110
Last hostedJul 18, 2026Jul 18, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
60
23,959

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 2200 and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 53,132 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 60 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than 2200 (3.1).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.1 min for 2200. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,954 vs 60). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
2200 has been hosted by 9 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.