WC3 TrackerMaps2200 vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

2200 vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,772 recorded sessions versus 60. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.1), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.1 min for 2200. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

2200 Warofraces
Head to Head
Metric2200Warofraces
Total sessions607,772
Unique hosts9258
Avg players/lobby3.14.6
Avg lobby open time4.1 min4 min
Sessions (30d)601,722
Tracked versions538
Last hostedJul 18, 2026Jul 18, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
60
4,001

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 2200 and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,772 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 60 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than 2200 (3.1).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.1 min for 2200. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,722 vs 60). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
2200 has been hosted by 9 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.