WC3 TrackerMaps3prf vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

3prf vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,673 recorded sessions versus 5. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 3), suggesting larger games. 3prf lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

3prf Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric3prfDirect Strike
Total sessions518,673
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby35.2
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)59,715
Tracked versions472
Last hostedJun 11, 2026Jun 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
5
10,677

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 3prf and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,673 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than 3prf (3).
3prf lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,715 vs 5). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
3prf has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.