WC3 TrackerMaps40k vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

40k vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,555 recorded sessions versus 688. 40k averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 8.7 min for 40k. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

40k Warofraces
Head to Head
Metric40kWarofraces
Total sessions6887,555
Unique hosts70258
Avg players/lobby5.3 4.6
Avg lobby open time8.7 min4 min
Sessions (30d)2301,636
Tracked versions1536
Last hostedJul 7, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
133
1,531
Jun 26
675
4,233
Jul 26
196
1,438

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 40k and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,555 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 688 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
40k has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 8.7 min for 40k. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,636 vs 230). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
40k has been hosted by 70 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.