WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs Battle For The Alamo
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs Battle For The Alamo

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 9,618 recorded sessions versus 2. 5329 averages more players per lobby (5 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.7 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 Battle For The Alamo
Head to Head
Metric5329Battle For The Alamo
Total sessions9,618 2
Unique hosts486 1
Avg players/lobby5 1.5
Avg lobby open time2.7 min1.1 min
Sessions (30d)2,442 1
Tracked versions572
Last hostedJun 11, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3,425
0
Jun 26
3,573
1

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and Battle For The Alamo on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 9,618 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (5) than Battle For The Alamo (1.5).
Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.7 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,442 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and Battle For The Alamo by 1. 5329 has the wider host base.