WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs Iceflow
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs Iceflow

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 9,477 recorded sessions versus 11. 5329 averages more players per lobby (5 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Iceflow lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 Iceflow
Head to Head
Metric5329Iceflow
Total sessions9,477 11
Unique hosts486 8
Avg players/lobby5 1.8
Avg lobby open time2.6 min0.6 min
Sessions (30d)2,548 2
Tracked versions571
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3,425
10
Jun 26
3,419
3

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and Iceflow on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 9,477 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (5) than Iceflow (1.8).
Iceflow lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,548 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and Iceflow by 8. 5329 has the wider host base.