WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 10,283 recorded sessions versus 1. 5329 averages more players per lobby (4.9 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)
Head to Head
Metric5329Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)
Total sessions10,283 1
Unique hosts486 1
Avg players/lobby4.9 1
Avg lobby open time2.6 min0.2 min
Sessions (30d)779 1
Tracked versions571
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 4, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3,425
0
Jun 26
5,468
0
Jul 26
582
1

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 10,283 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (4.9) than Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) (1).
Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (779 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) by 1. 5329 has the wider host base.