WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate)

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 9,480 recorded sessions versus 636. 5329 averages more players per lobby (5 vs 3.7), suggesting larger games. 5329 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 5.9 min for Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate). Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate)
Head to Head
Metric5329Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate)
Total sessions9,480 636
Unique hosts486 40
Avg players/lobby5 3.7
Avg lobby open time2.6 min 5.9 min
Sessions (30d)2,567 489
Tracked versions572
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
3,425
392
Jun 26
3,422
563

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 9,480 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 636 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (5) than Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) (3.7).
5329 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 5.9 min for Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,567 vs 489). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) by 40. 5329 has the wider host base.