WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs Zoodefencerb
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs Zoodefencerb

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 10,283 recorded sessions versus 66. 5329 averages more players per lobby (4.9 vs 2.9), suggesting larger games. Zoodefencerb lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 Zoodefencerb
Head to Head
Metric5329Zoodefencerb
Total sessions10,283 66
Unique hosts486 9
Avg players/lobby4.9 2.9
Avg lobby open time2.6 min1.4 min
Sessions (30d)817 13
Tracked versions572
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3,425
2
Jun 26
5,468
75
Jul 26
578
12

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and Zoodefencerb on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 10,283 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 66 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (4.9) than Zoodefencerb (2.9).
Zoodefencerb lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 2.6 min for 5329. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (817 vs 13). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and Zoodefencerb by 9. 5329 has the wider host base.