WC3 TrackerMapsAbyss Gates vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Abyss Gates vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,758 recorded sessions versus 20. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.1 min for Abyss Gates. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Abyss Gates Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAbyss GatesDirect Strike
Total sessions2047,758
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby25.3
Avg lobby open time3.1 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)29,898
Tracked versions2104
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
2
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
2
14,895

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Abyss Gates and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,758 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 20 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Abyss Gates (2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.1 min for Abyss Gates. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,898 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Abyss Gates has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.