WC3 TrackerMapsAge Of Darkness vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Age Of Darkness vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,483 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.5), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 12 min for Age Of Darkness. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Age Of Darkness Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricAge Of DarknessWarofraces
Total sessions47,483
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby2.54.6
Avg lobby open time12 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)41,673
Tracked versions135
Last hostedJun 30, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
4
4,233
Jul 26
0
1,171

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Age Of Darkness and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,483 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Age Of Darkness (2.5).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 12 min for Age Of Darkness. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,673 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Age Of Darkness has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.