WC3 TrackerMapsAmazonia S vs Survivalchaosreborn
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Amazonia S vs Survivalchaosreborn

Survivalchaosreborn is the more popular of the two, with 12,205 recorded sessions versus 13. Survivalchaosreborn averages more players per lobby (3.4 vs 1.2), suggesting larger games. Amazonia S lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. Over the past 30 days, Survivalchaosreborn has seen more activity.

Amazonia S Survivalchaosreborn
Head to Head
MetricAmazonia SSurvivalchaosreborn
Total sessions1312,205
Unique hosts6553
Avg players/lobby1.23.4
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 2.4 min
Sessions (30d)113,212
Tracked versions139
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
2,769
Jun 26
18
10,783
Jul 26
14
4,782

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Amazonia S and Survivalchaosreborn on Warcraft 3

Survivalchaosreborn is more popular, with 12,205 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 13 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Survivalchaosreborn has more players per lobby on average (3.4) than Amazonia S (1.2).
Amazonia S lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Survivalchaosreborn has had more sessions in the last 30 days (3,212 vs 11). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Amazonia S has been hosted by 6 unique BattleTags and Survivalchaosreborn by 553. Survivalchaosreborn has the wider host base.