WC3 TrackerMapsAmazonia S vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Amazonia S vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 13. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.2), suggesting larger games. Amazonia S lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Amazonia S Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricAmazonia SWarofraces
Total sessions137,636
Unique hosts6258
Avg players/lobby1.24.6
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)111,576
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
1,531
Jun 26
18
4,233
Jul 26
14
2,342

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Amazonia S and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 13 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Amazonia S (1.2).
Amazonia S lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,576 vs 11). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Amazonia S has been hosted by 6 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.