WC3 TrackerMapsAmazonia vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Amazonia vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 43,044 recorded sessions versus 51. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.1), suggesting larger games. Amazonia lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Amazonia Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAmazoniaDirect Strike
Total sessions5143,044
Unique hosts311,615
Avg players/lobby1.15.2
Avg lobby open time0.6 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)2310,241
Tracked versions3102
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
16
8,392
Jun 26
82
30,642
Jul 26
19
8,751

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Amazonia and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 43,044 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 51 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Amazonia (1.1).
Amazonia lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,241 vs 23). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Amazonia has been hosted by 31 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.