WC3 TrackerMapsAncient Egypt Rts vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ancient Egypt Rts vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 55,956 recorded sessions versus 1. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3 min for Ancient Egypt Rts. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Ancient Egypt Rts Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAncient Egypt RtsDirect Strike
Total sessions155,956
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby15.2
Avg lobby open time3 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)17,753
Tracked versions1114
Last hostedJul 24, 2026Jul 26, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
1
445,326

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ancient Egypt Rts and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 55,956 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Ancient Egypt Rts (1).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3 min for Ancient Egypt Rts. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (7,753 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ancient Egypt Rts has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.