WC3 TrackerMapsAndorhal vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Andorhal vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 43,167 recorded sessions versus 26. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.9), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.3 min for Andorhal. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Andorhal Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAndorhalDirect Strike
Total sessions2643,167
Unique hosts231,615
Avg players/lobby1.95.2
Avg lobby open time2.3 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)1710,407
Tracked versions2102
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
9
8,392
Jun 26
47
30,642
Jul 26
15
8,913

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Andorhal and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 43,167 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 26 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Andorhal (1.9).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.3 min for Andorhal. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,407 vs 17). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Andorhal has been hosted by 23 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.