WC3 TrackerMapsAnimal Farm Defense vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Animal Farm Defense vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 21,075 recorded sessions versus 6. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.9), suggesting larger games. Animal Farm Defense lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Animal Farm Defense Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAnimal Farm DefenseDirect Strike
Total sessions621,075
Unique hosts41,615
Avg players/lobby1.95.2
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)69,711
Tracked versions281
Last hostedJun 17, 2026Jun 18, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
6
13,136

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Animal Farm Defense and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 21,075 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 6 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Animal Farm Defense (1.9).
Animal Farm Defense lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,711 vs 6). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Animal Farm Defense has been hosted by 4 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.