WC3 TrackerMapsAnimals' Life Orpg vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Animals' Life Orpg vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 57,792 recorded sessions versus 2. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Animals' Life Orpg lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Animals' Life Orpg Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAnimals' Life OrpgDirect Strike
Total sessions257,792
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby1.55.2
Avg lobby open time0.4 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)19,721
Tracked versions2117
Last hostedJul 25, 2026Jul 28, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
1
448,342

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Animals' Life Orpg and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 57,792 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Animals' Life Orpg (1.5).
Animals' Life Orpg lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,721 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Animals' Life Orpg has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.