WC3 TrackerMapsAos Diablo (Beta 0.4) vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Aos Diablo (Beta 0.4) vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,587 recorded sessions versus 4. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 22.2 min for Aos Diablo (Beta 0.4). Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Aos Diablo (Beta 0.4) Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAos Diablo (Beta 0.4)Direct Strike
Total sessions447,587
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby45.3
Avg lobby open time22.2 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)09,887
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedMay 22, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
0
14,529

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Aos Diablo (Beta 0.4) and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,587 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Aos Diablo (Beta 0.4) (4).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 22.2 min for Aos Diablo (Beta 0.4). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,887 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Aos Diablo (Beta 0.4) has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.