WC3 TrackerMapsAos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0 vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Aos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0 vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,487 recorded sessions versus 9. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 15.6 min for Aos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Aos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0 Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricAos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0Warofraces
Total sessions97,487
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby1.44.6
Avg lobby open time15.6 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)01,684
Tracked versions135
Last hostedJun 27, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
10
4,233
Jul 26
0
1,180

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Aos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0 and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,487 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 9 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Aos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0 (1.4).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 15.6 min for Aos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,684 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Aos Gt T.F.T Yesrevive.V.0.1.0 has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.