WC3 TrackerMapsAssault On Icecrown vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Assault On Icecrown vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 24,682 recorded sessions versus 3. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Assault On Icecrown lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Assault On Icecrown Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAssault On IcecrownDirect Strike
Total sessions324,682
Unique hosts21,615
Avg players/lobby15.2
Avg lobby open time0.2 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)29,960
Tracked versions386
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jun 21, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
1
8,392
Jun 26
2
16,791

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Assault On Icecrown and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 24,682 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Assault On Icecrown (1).
Assault On Icecrown lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,960 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Assault On Icecrown has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.