WC3 TrackerMapsBait Tower Defence Final Protx vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bait Tower Defence Final Protx vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 57,991 recorded sessions versus 2. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 6 min for Bait Tower Defence Final Protx. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Bait Tower Defence Final Protx Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBait Tower Defence Final ProtxDirect Strike
Total sessions257,991
Unique hosts21,615
Avg players/lobby25.2
Avg lobby open time6 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)29,914
Tracked versions1117
Last hostedJul 24, 2026Jul 28, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
2
448,542

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bait Tower Defence Final Protx and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 57,991 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Bait Tower Defence Final Protx (2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 6 min for Bait Tower Defence Final Protx. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,914 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bait Tower Defence Final Protx has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.