WC3 TrackerMapsBaram Part L vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Baram Part L vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 55,239 recorded sessions versus 1. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Baram Part L Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBaram Part LDirect Strike
Total sessions155,239
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby15.2
Avg lobby open time1.7 min
Sessions (30d)17,154
Tracked versions1112
Last hostedJul 17, 2026Jul 24, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
1
443,296

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Baram Part L and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 55,239 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Baram Part L (1).
Baram Part L and Direct Strike have similar average lobby open times (around —).
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (7,154 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Baram Part L has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.