WC3 Tracker›Maps›Battle For The Alamo vs Survivalchaosreborn
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Battle For The Alamo vs Survivalchaosreborn

Survivalchaosreborn is the more popular of the two, with 6,547 recorded sessions versus 2. Survivalchaosreborn averages more players per lobby (3.4 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.2 min for Survivalchaosreborn. Over the past 30 days, Survivalchaosreborn has seen more activity.

Battle For The Alamo Survivalchaosreborn
Head to Head
MetricBattle For The AlamoSurvivalchaosreborn
Total sessions26,547 ▲
Unique hosts1545 ▲
Avg players/lobby1.53.4 ▲
Avg lobby open time1.1 min ▲2.2 min
Sessions (30d)13,130 ▲
Tracked versions231
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
2,769
Jun 26
1
3,547
Explore Each Map
Battle For The Alamo full stats → Survivalchaosreborn full stats → Watch live Battle For The Alamo lobbies Watch live Survivalchaosreborn lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Battle For The Alamo and Survivalchaosreborn on Warcraft 3

Survivalchaosreborn is more popular, with 6,547 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Survivalchaosreborn has more players per lobby on average (3.4) than Battle For The Alamo (1.5).
Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.2 min for Survivalchaosreborn. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Survivalchaosreborn has had more sessions in the last 30 days (3,130 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Battle For The Alamo has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Survivalchaosreborn by 545. Survivalchaosreborn has the wider host base.