WC3 TrackerMapsBattle For The Alamo vs Towersurvivors
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Battle For The Alamo vs Towersurvivors

Towersurvivors is the more popular of the two, with 15,398 recorded sessions versus 2. Towersurvivors averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.4 min for Towersurvivors. Over the past 30 days, Towersurvivors has seen more activity.

Battle For The Alamo Towersurvivors
Head to Head
MetricBattle For The AlamoTowersurvivors
Total sessions215,398
Unique hosts11,229
Avg players/lobby1.54.4
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 1.4 min
Sessions (30d)18,438
Tracked versions265
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
7,617
Jun 26
1
9,353

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Battle For The Alamo and Towersurvivors on Warcraft 3

Towersurvivors is more popular, with 15,398 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Towersurvivors has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Battle For The Alamo (1.5).
Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.4 min for Towersurvivors. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Towersurvivors has had more sessions in the last 30 days (8,438 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Battle For The Alamo has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Towersurvivors by 1,229. Towersurvivors has the wider host base.