WC3 TrackerMapsBattle For The Alamo vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Battle For The Alamo vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,694 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Battle For The Alamo Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBattle For The AlamoWarofraces
Total sessions24,694
Unique hosts1244
Avg players/lobby1.54.4
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,644
Tracked versions223
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
1
1,893

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Battle For The Alamo and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,694 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than Battle For The Alamo (1.5).
Battle For The Alamo lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,644 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Battle For The Alamo has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 244. Warofraces has the wider host base.