Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,555 recorded sessions versus 30. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.4), suggesting larger games. Bleed Overload Td lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.
Comparing Bleed Overload Td and Warofraces on Warcraft 3
Warofraces is more popular, with 7,555 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 30 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Bleed Overload Td (3.4).
Bleed Overload Td lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,628 vs 30). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bleed Overload Td has been hosted by 9 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.