WC3 TrackerMapsBleed Td vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bleed Td vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,856 recorded sessions versus 524. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.9), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.8 min for Bleed Td. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Bleed Td Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBleed TdDirect Strike
Total sessions52441,856
Unique hosts591,615
Avg players/lobby2.95.2
Avg lobby open time2.8 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)16010,411
Tracked versions38102
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
135
8,392
Jun 26
567
30,642
Jul 26
99
7,424

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bleed Td and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,856 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 524 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Bleed Td (2.9).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.8 min for Bleed Td. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,411 vs 160). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bleed Td has been hosted by 59 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.