WC3 TrackerMapsBleed Td vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bleed Td vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,492 recorded sessions versus 524. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.9), suggesting larger games. Bleed Td lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.8 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Bleed Td Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBleed TdWarofraces
Total sessions5247,492
Unique hosts59258
Avg players/lobby2.94.6
Avg lobby open time2.8 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)1601,617
Tracked versions3836
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
135
1,531
Jun 26
567
4,233
Jul 26
99
1,210

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bleed Td and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,492 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 524 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Bleed Td (2.9).
Bleed Td lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.8 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,617 vs 160). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bleed Td has been hosted by 59 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.