WC3 TrackerMapsBlizzardtd vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Blizzardtd vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 42,009 recorded sessions versus 112. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.6), suggesting larger games. Blizzardtd lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Blizzardtd Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBlizzardtdDirect Strike
Total sessions11242,009
Unique hosts481,615
Avg players/lobby1.65.2
Avg lobby open time1.4 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)7010,580
Tracked versions3102
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
30
8,392
Jun 26
165
30,642
Jul 26
48
7,606

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Blizzardtd and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 42,009 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 112 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Blizzardtd (1.6).
Blizzardtd lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,580 vs 70). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Blizzardtd has been hosted by 48 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.